Monthly Archives: May 2012

Three Year vs Four Year Medical School Programs

A friend recently asked me for some input regarding 3 year vs 4 year medical school programs. She was fortunate enough to have received several medical school acceptances and wanted to know the differences between the lengths of schooling. Currently in Canada, most medical schools are four year programs. Only McMaster University and the University of Calgary run a three year curriculum.

I went to a four year medical program, so I am biased towards four year programs but intrinsically there is nothing wrong with three year programs. I think shorter programs appeal to certain people and can work very well for them.

How Do Three Year Programs Work?

How is it possible to compress four years of medical school education into three years? The answer is that they don’t take breaks. At McMaster and Calgary, students don’t have summer vacations during their first and second year. Instead, they receive a shorter break, typically two weeks, before their next school year begins.

At the end of the day, these three year schools receive roughly the same total amount of pre-clinical and clinical training.

Advantages of a 3-year program

One Year Less of School – For people who have finished an undergrad degree, perhaps did an advanced degree, maybe even a PhD, a year less of school can mean a lot. Older applicants or people from non-traditional backgrounds might want to be done school sooner, so they can move forward with their lives.

Finances – The money you save in a three year program can be quite substantial. One less year of tuition can save you $15-20k. The year you save is also a year less of being in the red. Instead you get a year of income albeit a resident salary. The financial difference might come out to be $50,000. In the long run it might not be life-changing but with graduate debt so high, every bit counts.

Continuous Learning – Not having large gaps of time in your learning can help with retaining knowledge. Three year programs are more intense. Being completely immersed in an environment is one of the quickest ways to grow. It forces you to be efficient with your time and make the most of opportunities given to you

Advantages of a 4-year program

More Time to Decide – I believe the best thing about four year programs is that it gives you time to decide on what you want to do. Selecting a specialty is one of the most important decisions you will make. Most students don’t know what kind of a doctor they want to be when they first start medical school. It’s hard to come to a conclusion during pre-clinical years. You won’t really know what each specialty is like until you rotate through them during your clinical years.

One thing I appreciated about my school was that we did all our core rotations during our third year. We were also given elective time to explore different specialties. Rotating through all the disciplines early on helped guide my specialty decision. I felt like I got a good exposure and made an informed choice to do internal medicine.

I also liked having my electives after my mandatory core rotations. Most of my fourth year was spent doing electives. All my electives were pre-CaRMS, so I was able to get reference letters from preceptors easily and visit various schools I was intersted in.

Better Scheduling – Talking to a friend who was in a three-year program, I felt like I was more at peace with my specialty choice. Just when they were starting their clerkship in February, I had already done eight months of rotations and a few electives. By the time they were doing their core rotations, I was  doing electives at various schools, networking and preparing for CaRMS.

Three year schools can often feel rushed. Everything is on a tighter deadline. With a four year program, you have better spaced time to arrange electives and complete your CaRMS applications. For example, I didn’t take much call in my fourth year and used that extra time for applications. During the interview tour, I met some applicants from 3-year programs who had to take Obsgyn call DURING their interview period and some who had several core rotations left to complete. I on the other hand had already wrapped up my all my clinical duties, including subspecialties.

Summers Off - There’s a lot to be said about the benefits of having a chunk of time off from school. I truly appreciate the months I had off during first and second year. I got to travel quite a bit and had some unique learning opportunities overseas. I finally realized that bench research wasn’t for me. I took a summer to train and achieve one of my life-long goals of completing a marathon.

I am a much happier and enriched person because of those summers. Medical training is long, why rush into a grueling residency so soon?

Are there Advantages and Disadvantages for CaRMS?

I think one of the most misleading rumors I have heard is that 3-year program students are “disadvantaged” when it comes to CaRMS. The argument goes that because there are no summers, there is no time to do research or network with the right people. These students have a harder time arranging electives with their tight schedules. Because they haven’t completed their core rotations, when these students go for their audition electives, they don’t perform as well as other school’s medical students.

Looking at the 2012 Match Statistics, it may appear that McMaster had 18 unmatched students, more than average (PDF 41), which reflects poorly on their match results (PDF 10). But if you dig deeper, you can see that this year’s poor result was probably because they had more applicants applying for competitive specialties without backing up. Looking at (PDF 25), you can see that McMaster had 7 people gunning for ophthalmology and 6 for plastic surgery. Even if these people had attended a 4-year school, they wouldn’t have all matched based on the laws of supply and demand. Furthermore in PDF 26, when your school’s percentage of students who ranked family medicine as their 1st choice is the lowest in Canada – McMaster (28.6%), Calgary (27.8%), Queen’s (27.9%) – your school match rate will be guaranteed to be lower too.

While there may be anecdotal evidence for these claims that 3-year programs are disadvantaged, there are just as many counter examples of great applicants that refute them.

When it comes to CaRMS, the school you go to matters less than you think. The strength of your CaRMS application is more dependent on the strength of the applicant and their qualifications. There will always be hidden gems and rotten apples at every school.

The Bottom Line

Whether you go to a 3-year or a 4-year medical school, you will be properly trained to be a doctor. According to research comparing the lengths of medical school there is no significant differences worth noting. All Canadian medical schools are in good academic standing.

I previously wrote that when choosing a medical school, location is probably still the most important factor.

You won’t be disadvantaged in the CaRMS match if you go to a 3-year school. You will be disadvantaged if you choose a competitive specialty, even if you go to a 4-year program.

My advice is that if you are a younger and undecided about your career, go to a 4-year medical school. You will have a bit more time to decide on what you want to do. If you are a bit older or you know exactly what you want to get out of medical school, a 3-year program might just be for you.

The Case for Digital Notes

Are Digital Notes better than Pen and Paper?

Officially done medical school!

And if studying for the LMCC last week taught me anything, it’s the importance if having a learning system in place. I’m now doing my big academic purge in preparation for residency. I almost feel guilty for throwing out so much stuff.

There are binders and binders full of notes. Anatomy diagrams that I once knew, important tables and flowcharts. The only reason I feel at ease for destroying these notes is that I have a digital copy of them.

Why Do We Take Notes?

It’s important to understand why we take notes and what is their purpose. When we learn something new, the first step is information capture. To insure that all important ideas, thoughts and facts are captured there needs to be a ubiquitous and consistent system.

Taking notes is a basic form of information capture. It can be transcribing a professor’s lecture or jotting down some points on an index card.

After all the data is gathered, it has to be processed through reflection and creation. We write our own notes in a way that makes sense to us. Through spaced repetition we remember the key concepts, synthesize knowledge and apply it.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic Notes

Having been in school my whole life, I’m surprisingly a late-adopter to electronic notes. But since medical school, I have been using a hybrid approach of paper and electronic notes. Moving forward towards  residency, I believe a digital system is the best way to go.

Advantages of Electronic Notes

  • You can type much faster than you can write
  • Your notes are much more legible
  • Your notes are searchable and indexable
  • It’s more eco-friendly and space-saving
  • It’s easier to edit and revise them – changing fonts, colors, adding sidenotes
  • It’s easier to organize large amounts of information
  • Accessible anywhere with an internet connection, on your laptop, tablet or phone
Disadvantages of Electronic Notes

  • Not as portable – You always need a device to read your notes
  • Not good for diagrams, flow charts, mindmaps
  • Harder to capture knowledge in on-the-go settings (eg. not always practical to have a laptop)

How to Learn in Medical School

If I had to start medical school over again, I would strive to create a more organized knowledge database from the start. I would focus less on regurgitating lectures notes and more on understand how key concepts relate to each other. Using this method, I probably would have done worst on my tests but my knowledge would have been more solidified. Understanding the material you learn is the key to long term knowledge.

Most medical schools use a lecture based format with problem based learning interspersed during pre-clinical years. What I did was print off the lecture slides and studied off of them almost exclusively, memorizing all the fine details.

What I should have done was to summarize each lecture into just the key points (about 1 page). I should have then stored these notes in a comprehensive electronic system where I could easily retrieve them later. So that during clerkship, I wouldn’t dread having to go through old binders of notes to refresh my knowledge, but would have an accessible and personalized database to go through.

It’s through this repetition and rethinking of the same topics that finally lead to true knowledge. For example, I thought I understood the basics of heart failure the first time I learned about the anatomy and pathophysiology of the heart. I gained a new appreciation for this topic when I began seeing patients with heart failure. But it wasn’t until I combined the knowledge I had gained from the basic sciences with the clinical picture that I really understood it.

Potential Tools for a Digital Age

It doesn’t matter what tools you use as long as you use them consistently.

Your system could be as simple as properly labeled folders for each subject. Every time you learn about a new topic or read a journal article, you file away that knowledge in the right folder. I recommend using Dropbox (read my review) to make this simple system even more powerful, as your files can be accessible anywhere with an internet connection.

The system I used during medical school was to use Toronto Notes as a basic foundation. I would read up on specific topics and jot down additional information in the margins of TO notes. I would also try to incorporate class notes, clinical pearls and primary literature whenever possible. Clearly, it won’t be sufficient in residency.

At the start of third year, I started using Microsoft’s OneNote to keep track of all the pieces of information that didn’t quite fit in with TO notes. An alternative free option is EverNote. I made a notebook for each major specialty and found it a simple way of having all my notes in one place. I also found it useful because I could add new info to old topics. Using this method, I was able to keep track of stuff learned in teaching and bedside rounds. For residency, I plan to make condensed notes from a primary textbook that I can add on to my “knowledge database”.

Other tools I use include Mendeley which I use to keep track of journal articles I have read. What’s awesome about it is that it’s accessible anywhere. I can read a paper at the hospital, bookmark it or save it using just the browser, and have it accessible on my computer at home.

Organizing your browser bookmarks with something like Xmarks is another way to better manage information. Most of my go-to-sources are online now, including UpToDate and eMedicine. Similarly, there are so many good websites of knowledge out there for ECGs, Clinical pictures, and medical calculators that it’s important to keep track of your tools.

Furthermore, there are neat things you can do with electronic notes like make digital flashcards with programs such as Anki. You can even sync these cards to your phone.

There is also some really cool technology like Livescribe (15% off), which is a pen that digitally records everything you write. There’s even a built in voice-recorder.

Conclusion

The way doctors learned medicine thirty years ago is very different from today. Especially now when medical knowledge is expanding so quickly, there will always be too much to know in too little time. It’s time we use new methods and tools to enhance our learning.

In a time when medical information is changing so quickly, it doesn’t make sense anymore to use something as outdated as pen and paper. The dynamic nature of electronic notes plus the fact that it’s syncable and accessible anywhere, makes it the ideal format for learning medicine in the 21st century. With the abundance of portable laptops, tablets, and smart phones, I hope I have convinced you that electronic notes is the best way to go.

 

The LMCC Study Plan

What's the best way to study for the LMCC? (Photo:Fanz)

I’m on my final stretch of medical school with only the LMCC exam to write. For those that are unfamiliar with the certification process, when you graduate from medical school in Canada, you are required to write the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I (MCCQE Part I). Part II, which is in an OSCE format, comes later during your PGY2 of residency.

The Challenge

There is only one goal when writing the LMCC and that is to pass the exam. That pass mark is set at 390, and scores range from 50 to 950 (MCC Scoring). How well or poorly you did doesn’t matter as long as you pass.

And for a $900 exam, you want to only write it once.

The MCCQE Outline

How does one study everything they have learned in medical school for one single exam?

The answer is you can’t possible know everything cold (objectives). But the secret is to know how the exam was written and what topics you must cover. You see the exam material tests you on six areas of medicine including

1. Internal Medicine
2. Surgery
3. Pediatrics
4. Obstetrics and Gynecology
5. Psychiatry
6. CLEO (Considerations of the Legal, Ethical and Organizational Aspects of the Practice of Medicine)

Obviously some of these subjects like Internal Medicine are much more extensive than the others. However, the test is weighted equally between all six subjects. Meaning that each of those subjects is worth 1/6 of the exam and they will all have the same number of questions allotted to each.

The LMCC Strategy

Knowing that each part is weighted equally, the only rational way to approach studying for this exam is to study the highest yield subjects first. To maximize your efforts you should spend the most time on sections which cover the least amount of information.

The order you should approach this exam is to study (1) CLEO (2) Psychiatry (3 & 4) Peds & OBSGYN, (5) Surgery and completely ignore (6) Internal Medicine.

And although you may think knowing how to treat a heart attack or read an ECG is important – and it is in a clinical setting – you will get much more points studying about occupational hazards and different types of study design.

MCCQE Study Materials

Almost everyone studies exclusively from Toronto Notes, which was originally a study guide for the LMCC! Looking at the Table of Contents, the high yield topics of CLEO consists of 2 chapters, Psych – 1 chapter, Peds 1- chapter, Obsgyn – 2 chapters. Surgery has 9 chapters and Internal Medicine has a whooping 13 chapters, almost as much as the rest combined.

I also had some friends who tried Essentials for the Canadian Medical Licensing Exam and Canada QBank with poor reviews, so I would recommend against them.

Execution

So for the last few weeks, I have been ignoring my chosen field of specialty (Internal) and have been reading exclusively the other five topics. The result has both refreshing and frustrating at times.

It has been good to refresh my memory on a lot of topics I had forgotten. It’s been almost a year and a half since I last did obstetrics, so a quick refresher was nice. I even learned something new about health care and public health in Canada. But it’s also been frustrating because the topics that I intrinsically am interested in – Cardio, Pulm, Nephro, Rheum, etc – are also the ones that are the lowest yield.

In a way, the LMCC will not prepare me at all for a residency in Internal Medicine.

But I think I’ve resigned myself to that fact. Afterall one of the perks of being in Internal is little to no off service rotations for the next few years. Now… if there only wasn’t a Part II…