Monthly Archives: March 2010

See One, Do One, Teach One

To learn medicine, they say you need to see it done once, do it yourself once and finally teach someone else how to do it.

This has always been the way it was taught. But despite being such a classic didactic model, I wonder if this is the best and right way to learn?

I remember the first time I heard about the hidden curriculum of medical school. It was the story of medical students performing pelvic exams on unconscious patients who had not given their consent. The argument was where else would students get the chance to practice, no patient would want a inexperienced student doing an unnecessary and invasive exam, all in the name of learning. And I’ve talked to some senior doctors about this, and even though they are very ethical and caring doctors, they shared their experience about going along and not questioning it, even when they knew it was wrong. I’m afraid I will be in similar situations in the future, and I am scared that I will not know what to do.

Today, I stumbled across a report on “Providing a strategic vision for improving patient safety” and came across the following quote.

“The old approach to teaching procedures—See one, Do one, Teach one—
is antithetical to safe, patient-centered care. Simulation provides the
opportunity for one to see as many as one would like, do as many as
are necessary to demonstrate procedural competence, and leave the
teaching to experts.”

In one sense, I agree completely that simulation can be a perfect way to hone your skills so you can be competent when you finally see your patients. On the other hand, I also think that you can’t learn and understand the complete practice of medicine in the classroom or simulation room in this case. You learn medicine by interacting with human beings, real patients with real diseases. You remember faces and emotions associated with diseases. You get the real deal, not just a fictitious rigid simulation. I don’t know what my complete thoughts are about medical school training, but I just want to leave you all with this quote by one of the greatest physicians of the 20th century.

He who studies medicine without books sails an uncharted sea, but he who studies medicine without patients does not go to sea at all.

- William Osler

Change the World

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/2259592476/

Often in the thick of studying for a final exam, when medicine seems to be reduced to just memorizing long lists of diseases, anatomy, drugs and information – I think and ask, why am I in medicine?

I remember before starting university and still was wondering what direction my life would take, I wrote out what I thought were the top 3 most pressing problems in the world. They were in no particular order

  1. Environmental Damage – including Global Warming, Pollution, Species Extinction.
  2. Extreme Poverty.
  3. Overpopulation and Intolerance to Others – including terrorism, peace conflicts, racism, etc.

When I look forward, I frequently question that difference a doctor can make. I acknowledge that you get to see the rewards of your efforts. Your actions have quick and direct results. But I wonder how much influence a doctor can have in large lasting changes? At most, a doctor will directly interact and help around ten thousand patients over his or her lifetime. A small drop in our global population.

Furthermore, for most doctors practicing in North America, they are treating people who have lived “privileged” lives. No war, no poverty, no famine or epidemics. Although we are helping people who have serious illnesses, there is always this guilt within me that tells me that there are people out there who are more deserving of help. People who live on less than a dollar a day, people who have never had an education, people who struggle everyday just to live.

I wonder how my studies in medicine are making the world a better place. Am I helping preserve our natural environment? How am I addressing the economic struggles of billions of people?

That’s why I think policy and research are so important. Passing a health care bill can instantly provide health care to millions who did not have access before. Vaccines have saved millions of children all around the world from debilitating diseases.  As just a primary care physician, although you are helping many people directly, there is a limit to your abilities.

Everyone wants to change the world, few have the chance to, and fewer actually do. And often I wonder was  studying medicine and becoming a doctor the right path to take. I guess my future is still ahead of me and it’s a bit too early to tell what’s in store down the road.

Helping by Proximity

I was planning to write a nice long “How to Prepare for a Multiple Mini Interview” article to help medical school applicants. Instead, I have used that time to help prepare my friends for their medical school interviews.

I find that I don’t have the time or energy to do both. After helping out my friends for several hours, I often feel drained. I want to keep anything interview related out of my mind.

Theoretically, an article is more replicable, long term and can reach a larger audience reader. However, I can’t help but feel inclined to help my friends who I know personally. I also feel like I can make a more positive and definite impact with the help I give them. I also find it more rewarding as I can actually see their improvement.

So it comes down to should I help out friends I know in real life, where I have a bigger impact and find more rewarding although it being tiring, OR should I posts article that have a further reach, will take less time and energy to propagate after writing it, but often at times feels quite empty?